PLATFORM • RESEARCH — Powered by CoolTool
Full-cycle studies. AI in every part.
Surveys, implicit, behavioral, sensory, eye-tracking — all methods in one builder. AI agents handle analysis, open-end coding, and presentations. Connect RIWI's audience or bring your own. Self-service, full-cycle, shareable.
One builder for any method. One audience, verified. One AI doing the work that used to fill a team's week.
Any method. One platform.
Surveys aren't enough. Implicit isn't enough alone. The Research product combines them.
Surveys
Quantitative surveys with full skip logic, randomization, conditional questions, multi-language support.
Implicit measurement
Reaction-time tests, IAT, priming. Measure what people don't tell you they think.
Eye-tracking
Webcam-based and lab-grade. Heatmaps, fixation, saccades. Where attention actually goes.
Emotion measurement
Facial coding for valence and arousal. The emotional response stated answers can't capture.
Sensory research
Taste, smell, texture studies — methods built for sensory categories where survey questions miss.
Behavioral instruments
Drag-and-drop, card sort, MaxDiff, conjoint. Choice mechanics that reveal preference structure.
Packaging & shelf
Virtual shelf testing, pack design, FMOT studies. Where eye-tracking + survey become decisive.
Ad and concept tests
Pre-test, copy test, post-test. Implicit + survey + emotion in one study.
Built for the studies that move businesses.
Concept testing
Pre-test concepts before the spend. Implicit + survey reveal genuine pull versus polite approval.
Ad testing
Survey + implicit + emotion. The full picture before air. Optimize creative before media spend.
Pack design
Eye-tracking on shelf, before the line runs. Heatmaps reveal whether the pack captures attention at FMOT.
Brand tracking
Equity measurement that captures what surveys miss. Implicit associations reveal what drives preference.
We used to spend $50K per eye-tracking study in a lab. CoolTool gives us the same quality via webcam, at a fraction of the cost, in a fraction of the time.
Bertolli: Should they change the bottle or protect existing equity?
A global CPG brand needed to decide: launch a new bottle design or keep the iconic original. Traditional research gave conflicting signals. Research gave clarity.
1. Attention
New bottle captured attention faster and improved visual flow on shelf.
2. Emotions
Measured facial responses to both designs in real shelf context.
3. Implicit perception
Tested subconscious brand associations for each design.
4. Stated preference
No measurable lift in purchase intent for the new design.
Keep existing packaging. Raise price instead.
New bottle won attention but not purchase intent. Research identified pricing elasticity as a stronger lever than visual redesign. The brand avoided a costly national packaging rollout.
Sign up free. Run your first study today.
Free tier across all three products on the platform. No method gates. No audience minimums in sandbox.